Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2015-09-02 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.43 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 409.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 520 hours standby time 13.2 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia Z5 has a general score of 77.6, which is a little bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's general score of 72.6. The Xperia Z5 is an notably older device than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's extremely lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. These phones include Android operating system, but Xperia Z5 has the older 5.1 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little bit better processing power than Xperia Z5, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with 5 GB more RAM. The Sony Xperia Z5 features a brighter screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a way smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a bit greater number of pixels in each inch in the display.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia Z5, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much longer battery life than Xperia Z5, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 2900mAh.
Realme X3 SuperZoom shoots better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia Z5, and although they both have the same video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a camera in the back with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a lot larger camera sensor.
Sony Xperia Z5 costs a bit more than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.