Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2024-09-26 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi 14T Pro is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom, with an 84.5 score against 72.6. Xiaomi 14T Pro's body is noticeably newer and a little thinner, but a bit heavier than realme X3 SuperZoom. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi 14T Pro has newer 14 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Xiaomi 14T Pro features a lot better looking screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a quite better 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution, a little bit larger display and a little better screen pixel density.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro has a superior memory to store more games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with improved battery life than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 19% larger battery capacity. The Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with just a bit better camera than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a back camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality, a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.