Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark is better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a general score of 80.4 against 72.6. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Black Shark has the newer 9.0 Pie version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, so it gives a couple nice extra features. Xiaomi Black Shark's construction is just a little lighter than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it is a little bit thicker and was released many years before.
Xiaomi Black Shark has a bit better looking screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater screen density. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Black Shark. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a way bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and videos, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Black Shark and realme X3 SuperZoom feature very similar storage capacity to install applications and games, they have equal internal memory capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a 5% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.