Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-03-28 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black and Silver |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a general score of 82.3, which is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom's global score of 72.6. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 is a just a little bit heavier phone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but both of them are equally thin. These phones have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Black Shark 2. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 counts with just a bit better display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better display density.
Realme X3 SuperZoom takes a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger back-facing camera sensor, a back camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Realme X3 SuperZoom and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 have similar memory capacity to store more games and applications, they have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.