Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has an overall score of 82.9, which is better than realme X3 SuperZoom's global score of 72.6. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is a a little bit heavier phone than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but both have the same thickness. These devices work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has the newer 9.0 Pie version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, so it provides you a couple nice extra features.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's processing unit is very similar to realme X3 SuperZoom's processor, both of them have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a slightly better looking screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit higher number of pixels in each display inch.
Realme X3 SuperZoom and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro count with incredibly similar storage capacity for games and applications, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has just a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.