Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2022-04-04 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black and White |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a general score of 78.7, which is a bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom's general score of 72.6. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro design is newer than the realme X3 SuperZoom's, although it is just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a newer 12 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a just a little higher display pixel density. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much better hardware performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a little longer battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 4650mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features just a bit better camera than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a way smaller sensor taking lot lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.