Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.62 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T has a general score of 87.9, which is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's global score of 72.6. These phones have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). Despite being the best in this review, it must be noted that it is also a bit thicker and a little heavier. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 10T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 2 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 10T features a slightly better display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Xiaomi Mi 10T also counts with a quite bigger screen. Xiaomi Mi 10T captures a bit better photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same sensor size and a 64 mega-pixels resolution camera, the Xiaomi Mi 10T also counts with a much better video quality.
Xiaomi Mi 10T's storage for games and applications is very similar to the realme X3 SuperZoom one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi 10T features greater battery performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.