Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a global score of 90, which is a lot better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 global score. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro design is a little heavier and just a little thicker than realme X3 SuperZoom. Both phones in this review come with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro also counts with a little bit larger screen. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to the realme X3 SuperZoom one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with better battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with a little bit better camera than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a bigger aperture for better captures in low-light environments, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.