Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom, with a global score of 81.4 against 72.6. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, so it gives a lot of extra features. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE design is way lighter and somewhat thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom, even though it was released a little bit over a year before.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a little bit better screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. The realme X3 SuperZoom and the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE count with really similar memory to install games and applications, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a higher amount of RAM. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a much better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger back camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.