Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a global score of 82.7, which is better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's global score of 72.6. Both devices in this comparison work with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding operating system features. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a a little lighter cellphone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but both of them are equally thin.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little sharper screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixels density. The realme X3 SuperZoom features just a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro and realme X3 SuperZoom feature quite similar memory for games and applications, they have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate and a same size camera aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a lot better 64 MP resolution camera and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.