Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-07-27 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and Red |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi A2 has a score of 78, which is slightly better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 overall score. Xiaomi Mi A2's design is thinner and somewhat lighter than the realme X3 SuperZoom, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better display than Xiaomi Mi A2, because although it has a just a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Realme X3 SuperZoom and Xiaomi Mi A2 both feature really similar storage capacity for games and applications, both have equal 128 GB internal storage. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Mi A2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi A2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a lot bigger back camera sensor, faster video frame rates and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a really longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.