Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black and Gold |
| Glass and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is a bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a global score of 77.5 against 72.6. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 design is somewhat thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it is just a bit heavier and was released many years before. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a bit larger screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit more pixels per display inch.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features a superior storage capacity for apps and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Mi Max 2 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 128 GB. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a greater camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger camera aperture, a back camera with much more megapixels, a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and faster video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features improved battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 5300mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.