Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with a score of 83.8 against 72.6. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s design is a little thinner and just a bit lighter than the realme X3 SuperZoom, even though it was released 2 years before. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little bit better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little bit inferior pixels quantity per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bigger screen.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The realme X3 SuperZoom features superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a lot better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution, better video frame rate and a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s costs a lot more money than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.