Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue and Green |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting an 83.8 score against 72.6. Although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is older and just a little bit heavier than the realme X3 SuperZoom, it's body is still a little bit thinner. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. Both have 8 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a slightly better display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rate and a F1.8 camera aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a camera with way more MP and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom has better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.