Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-06-02 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black and Silver |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 is slightly better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with a overall score of 76 against 72.6. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 body is thinner and lighter than realme X3 SuperZoom, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, providing you a couple nice extra features.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a larger display, a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit higher display density. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Note 2's memory capacity for apps and games is just as good as realme X3 SuperZoom's one, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom captures way better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a bigger camera aperture and a much bigger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 4070mAh.
Although Xiaomi Mi Note 2 is a better device, it is more expensive than the realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the realme X3 SuperZoom. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Note 2, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the realme X3 SuperZoom, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.