Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2912 x 1224 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 458 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4780mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mix Flip has a score of 83.2, which is better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 general score. The Xiaomi Mix Flip design is newer, somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than the realme X3 SuperZoom. Both devices we are comparing come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mix Flip has a more recent 14 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, so it counts with a couple additional features and performance enhancements.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a much greater hardware performance than Xiaomi Mix Flip, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Xiaomi Mix Flip features a much sharper display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a slightly better 1224 x 2912 resolution and a bit larger display.
The Xiaomi Mix Flip features much more memory capacity to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Realme X3 SuperZoom captures a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mix Flip, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and better video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Mix Flip features a bit better battery duration than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 14 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.