Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a score of 81.6 against 72.6. These phones have the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. Although it's the best we are comparing, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC design is a little heavier and just a little thicker than the realme X3 SuperZoom.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit sharper display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a little bit bigger display. The realme X3 SuperZoom has just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 256 GB. Realme X3 SuperZoom shoots slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same camera sensor size and a 64 mega-pixels camera in the back, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger aperture for better low light images and videos and higher video frame rate.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features improved battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.