Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | -- |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | -- |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a global score of 86.1, which is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a just a bit heavier but just a little thinner cellphone than the realme X3 SuperZoom.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has just a bit better display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a just a bit more pixels per screen inch, a better resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels and a little bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro and realme X3 SuperZoom have extremely similar memory for games and applications, they have the same internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 5160mAh battery size. Realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with a way lower 64 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.