Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | -- |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a little bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having a 77.1 score against 72.6. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's design weights the same than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it is a bit thinner. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a very superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a sharper display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a little more pixels per inch of display, a bit larger display and a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels.
The realme X3 SuperZoom captures slightly better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much lower resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features much more memory capacity for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has superior battery duration than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.