Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-01-15 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 is better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, getting an 80.3 score against 72.6. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 design is just a little lighter and just a little thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom, although it was released a little bit over a year before. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit bigger display.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 256 GB.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The realme X3 SuperZoom captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.