Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is just a bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having a global score of 76.6 against 72.6. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 body has the same thickness than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it is a little bit lighter. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 10 OS (operating system).
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a bit larger screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit better pixel number per inch of display. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit more storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features longer battery life than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 4200mAh.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a back camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution, a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos and a much better (4K) video definition.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.