Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, getting an 81.1 score against 72.6. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so they should provide all the same OS features. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body has the same thickness than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's a bit heavier.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a just a bit better screen density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 2 GB more RAM. The realme X3 SuperZoom shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a camera with a 64 mega pixels, the same (4K) video definition and a 0.59 inches sensor, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features improved battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 20 percent larger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.