Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom, with a overall score of 79 against 72.6. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the newer 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, providing some nice extra features. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S design has the same thickness than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's a little heavier.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger camera sensor, a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and better 60 fps video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features greater battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.