Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a global score of 83, which is better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's overall score of 72.6. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's construction is just a little bit thicker but just a little lighter than realme X3 SuperZoom, and both were only released with a few months difference. Both phones in this comparison come with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a little higher amount of pixels in each screen inch, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite bigger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has more storage capacity to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has faster video frame rates, a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has better battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.