Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Blue |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a general score of 80.2, which is better than realme X3 SuperZoom's score of 72.6. Both devices in our current comparison use the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that. Even though the ZTE Axon 10 Pro is older than the realme X3 SuperZoom, it's design is somewhat lighter and thinner.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a little more vivid display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a bit greater pixel quantity per display inch, a little bigger display and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. ZTE Axon 10 Pro's processor is very similar to the realme X3 SuperZoom one, and although the ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a higher amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Realme X3 SuperZoom shoots much better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a very superior storage for applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a bit longer battery duration than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a lot more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.