Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a general score of 78.1 against 72.6. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has 11 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, providing some nice extra features and some performance improvements. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a newer cellphone, and it's also a little bit lighter and thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better performance than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra. Both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little more vivid display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's storage for games and applications is just as good as the realme X3 SuperZoom one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory. Realme X3 SuperZoom captures a little bit better photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video definition and the same resolution back facing camera, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with better video frame rate.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has just a bit better battery life than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 4600mAh battery size instead of 4200mAh.
Although ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the realme X3 SuperZoom. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy realme X3 SuperZoom, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.