Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-20 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a score of 82.5, which is much better than the realme X50 5G's 73 general score. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 2 XL is noticeably older than realme X50 5G, it's construction is thinner and lighter. Realme X50 5G features a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have 8 cores, the realme X50 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit sharper screen than realme X50 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a better pixel density. Google Pixel 2 XL and realme X50 5G have very similar storage for applications and games, both of them have equal internal memory capacity.
Realme X50 5G counts with better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3520mAh. The realme X50 5G counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the realme X50 5G also has a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.