Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is a bit better than the realme X50 5G's 73 score. Even though the Google Pixel 3 is older than the realme X50 5G, it's construction is thinner and a lot lighter. Realme X50 5G has a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the realme X50 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better looking display than realme X50 5G, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2160px resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher display pixel density. The realme X50 5G counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video resolution, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video frame rates, the realme X50 5G also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Realme X50 5G counts with a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Realme X50 5G has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 44% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.