Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-07-20 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | S-LCD 3 |
| 399 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is slightly better than realme X50 5G, getting a global score of 77.7 against 73. The HTC One M9 design is notably lighter than realme X50 5G, although it's a little thicker and was released 6 years before. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version while realme X50 5G has Android 10.
HTC One M9 features a more vivid display than realme X50 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density. The realme X50 5G counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
HTC One M9 features a little faster CPU than realme X50 5G, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processing unit. Realme X50 5G has a little bit better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the realme X50 5G also has a way more MP camera in the back and a bigger aperture.
Realme X50 5G features a much longer battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 48 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.