Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than realme X50 5G, getting a global score of 81.3 against 73. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner than the realme X50 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking screen than realme X50 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a higher pixel quantity in each display inch.
The LG V35 ThinQ and realme X50 5G both feature similar CPUs, both have 6 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores. The realme X50 5G shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the realme X50 5G also counts with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
LG V35 ThinQ features much more storage for games and applications than realme X50 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Realme X50 5G counts with improved battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 27 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.