Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-20 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than the realme X50 5G's score of 73. The LG Velvet construction is somewhat thinner and lighter than the realme X50 5G, even though both of them were only released with a few months difference. The realme X50 5G and the LG Velvet count with quite similar screens, because although the LG Velvet has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
Realme X50 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than LG Velvet. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. LG Velvet counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than realme X50 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet counts with a bit longer battery performance than realme X50 5G, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. LG Velvet captures a little bit better pictures and videos than realme X50 5G. They have a same resolution camera, the same video frame rate, the same video quality and the same diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.