Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-20 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is a little bit better than the realme X50 5G, having a global score of 77.4 against 73. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is an notably older cellphone than the realme X50 5G, but Motorola could make it notably thinner and lighter anyway. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little bit better screen than realme X50 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The realme X50 5G features a bit superior CPU than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 cores, the realme X50 5G also has more RAM memory. The realme X50 5G counts with a better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the realme X50 5G also has a back camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much better storage for games and applications than realme X50 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The realme X50 5G counts with a superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.