Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-20 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Play is a little bit better than realme X50 5G, having a overall score of 77.4 against 73. Despite of the fact that Motorola Moto Z2 Play is notably older than the realme X50 5G, it's design is lighter and way thinner. Realme X50 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the realme X50 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The realme X50 5G has a little more vivid display than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger screen. The Moto Z2 Play has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than realme X50 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The realme X50 5G counts with a way better battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 3000mAh. Realme X50 5G features a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the realme X50 5G also counts with a much higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.