Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-07-20 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 has a global score of 77.6, which is slightly better than the realme X50 5G's 73 score. Both phones we are comparing include Android operating system, but Moto Z3 has the newer 9.0 Pie version and realme X50 5G has Android 10. Moto Z3 is an older phone than the realme X50 5G, but it is noticeably thinner and extremely lighter anyway.
Moto Z3 has a display that's just as good as the realme X50 5G one, because although the Moto Z3 has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a bit greater display density. Realme X50 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than realme X50 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The realme X50 5G captures much better photos and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the realme X50 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images in poorly lited situations and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The realme X50 5G counts with a much better battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 40 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.