Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-20 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 Play is a bit better than the realme X50 5G, having a 76.3 score against 73. Moto Z3 Play is an way older cellphone than the realme X50 5G, but Motorola was able to make it incredibly thinner and lighter anyway. Realme X50 5G counts with a bit better screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a quite worse pixel count in each inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Realme X50 5G has a bit superior processing unit than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the realme X50 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The realme X50 5G counts with a much better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the realme X50 5G also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Moto Z3 Play features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than realme X50 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The realme X50 5G has a really longer battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.