Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-20 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a general score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than the realme X50 5G's global score of 73. These devices work with Android OS, but the nubia Red Magic 3S has the newer 9.0 Pie version while realme X50 5G has Android 10, so it counts with a couple additional features and some performance improvements. Even being the best in our current comparison, nubia Red Magic 3S's design is older, a little thicker and just a bit heavier than the realme X50 5G.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better performance than realme X50 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S and realme X50 5G feature quite similar displays, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit worse screen density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a quite larger display.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior storage to install applications and games than realme X50 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a bit better camera than realme X50 5G, and although they both have a back camera with a 48 mega-pixels, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way better video resolution and a bigger aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features improved battery performance than realme X50 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.