Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-20 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is better than realme X50 5G's global score of 73. The Galaxy A50 is an older device than the realme X50 5G, but Samsung managed to make it lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The realme X50 5G has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the realme X50 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Realme X50 5G and Samsung Galaxy A50 both count with extremely similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better count of pixels per inch in the screen. The realme X50 5G takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy A50 features a much greater storage for games and applications than realme X50 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The realme X50 5G counts with a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 5 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.