Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-20 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) is much better than realme X50 5G, with an 85.2 score against 73. Galaxy A9 (2018)'s body is a little lighter and thinner than realme X50 5G, although it was released around 20 months before. The realme X50 5G has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a bit larger display.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much bigger storage for applications and games than realme X50 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Realme X50 5G has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A9 (2018). Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Realme X50 5G counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 3800mAh. Realme X50 5G takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking images and video in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the realme X50 5G also counts with a lot more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.