Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is way better than the realme X50 5G's 73 global score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version and realme X50 5G has Android 10, so it gives a lot of extra features and optimized performance. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is just a little bit heavier but a little thinner than realme X50 5G, and both of them were only released with a couple months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a little better hardware performance than realme X50 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better display than realme X50 5G, because it has a little bit greater screen density, a quite larger display and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than realme X50 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a greater camera than realme X50 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot better video quality.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better battery life than realme X50 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.