Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-07-20 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has an overall score of 79.3, which is a bit better than the realme X50 5G's overall score of 73. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version while realme X50 5G has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is an notably older device than the realme X50 5G, but it is lighter and somewhat thinner anyway.
Realme X50 5G counts with a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and 7 more cpu cores. The Galaxy Note 5 has a sharper screen than realme X50 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The realme X50 5G features a superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The realme X50 5G features a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity. Realme X50 5G captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the realme X50 5G also has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.