Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-20 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a global score of 79.5, which is a bit better than the realme X50 5G's 73 global score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note7 is noticeably older than the realme X50 5G, it's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. The Galaxy Note7 has just a bit better looking display than realme X50 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
Realme X50 5G has a bit better performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. The Galaxy Note7 counts with slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games than realme X50 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The realme X50 5G counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 20 percent greater battery capacity. Realme X50 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the realme X50 5G also counts with a way better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.