Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-07-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than realme X50 5G, with a general score of 95.4 against 73. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and realme X50 5G has Android 10 version, counting with a lot of extra features. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a heavier cellphone than realme X50 5G, but both of them have the same thickness.
Realme X50 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better display than realme X50 5G, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a greater pixels density and a little bit bigger display.
Realme X50 5G and Galaxy S22 Ultra have incredibly similar storage to install games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than realme X50 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with better battery life than realme X50 5G, because it has a 19% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.