Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-20 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 Active has a score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than realme X50 5G's 73 global score. Despite of the fact Galaxy S7 Active is extremely older and thicker than the realme X50 5G, it's body is still just a bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a much better display than realme X50 5G, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels count in each display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The realme X50 5G has a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Realme X50 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster) and more RAM.
The realme X50 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5% bigger battery capacity. Realme X50 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the realme X50 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.