Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-20 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 is much better than the realme X50 5G, with a global score of 81.7 against 73. The Samsung Galaxy S8 is an older device than realme X50 5G, but it is way lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Galaxy S8 features a little bit better looking screen than realme X50 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
The realme X50 5G has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the realme X50 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The realme X50 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the realme X50 5G also counts with a much better resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy S8 features a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than realme X50 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Realme X50 5G counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 40 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.