Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-20 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is better than realme X50 5G, getting a general score of 81.9 against 73. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active body is much older, just a little heavier and thicker than realme X50 5G. The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a bit better looking screen than realme X50 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Realme X50 5G has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the realme X50 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Realme X50 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the realme X50 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features slightly more memory capacity for applications and games than realme X50 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Realme X50 5G has a bit better battery life than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.