Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-20 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is better than the realme X50 5G's 73 global score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S9 is much older than realme X50 5G, it's body is a little thinner and somewhat lighter. The realme X50 5G has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the realme X50 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a bit better looking screen than realme X50 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution. The Galaxy S9 counts with more storage capacity for games and applications than realme X50 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 400 GB.
Realme X50 5G counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 40 percent bigger battery capacity. The realme X50 5G takes a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photos and videos in low light environments and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the realme X50 5G also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.