Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-07-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| 399 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is slightly better than the realme X50 5G's score of 73. These phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while realme X50 5G has Android 10 version, giving some additional features and some performance improvements. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is better than realme X50 5G, we must note that it's also much thicker and much heavier.
The realme X50 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the realme X50 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better looking screen than realme X50 5G, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels count per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The realme X50 5G takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution and a lot higher resolution back facing camera. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has more storage for games and applications than realme X50 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better battery lifetime than realme X50 5G, because it has a 7 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.