Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is better than the realme X50 5G, with an 81 score against 73. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, the Galaxy XCover Pro construction is a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than the realme X50 5G. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover Pro has newer 11 version and realme X50 5G has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro and realme X50 5G count with quite similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels amount in each display inch. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with more memory to store more apps and games than realme X50 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The realme X50 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the realme X50 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The realme X50 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Realme X50 5G features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.