Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a lot better than the realme X50 5G, with an 88.5 score against 73. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version while realme X50 5G has Android 10, so it counts with some additional features. Even when the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and realme X50 5G were released only a couple of months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is thinner and a little bit lighter.
Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better processing power than realme X50 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little more vivid screen than realme X50 5G, because it has a bit bigger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a little greater pixel number per inch of display.
Realme X50 5G shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the realme X50 5G also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution. Galaxy Z Flip has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than realme X50 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The realme X50 5G has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.