Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is way better than realme X50 5G's overall score of 73. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is notably thinner but noticeably heavier than the realme X50 5G, and both of them were released only 2 months apart. These devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and realme X50 5G has Android 10 version.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better performance than realme X50 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 6 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 and realme X50 5G both have very similar screens, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen and a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208.
The realme X50 5G shoots a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the realme X50 5G also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than realme X50 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better battery performance than realme X50 5G, because it has a 7 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.